• 歐洲之聲發刊詞 Eng
  • 關於我們 About us
  • 隱私條款 Privacy Policy
  • 提供新聞 Authors contributions
  • 連絡我們 Contact us
歐洲之聲 Sino Euro Voices
  • 首頁
  • 關注熱點

    【歐洲之聲】G7峰會梅克爾又「綏靖」了?

    【胡平論政】:從港首林鄭月娥接種中國疫苗談起

    德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠

    【老陳時評】將抵制北京冬奧成為歷史的拐點

    【美國之音】六十年的中國觀察 孔傑榮:習近平正播下反對他的種子

    上一個 下一個
  • 政經論壇

    【歐洲之聲】G7峰會梅克爾又「綏靖」了?

    中共為何隆重紀念華國鋒

    【胡平論政】:從港首林鄭月娥接種中國疫苗談起

    【美國之音】六十年的中國觀察 孔傑榮:習近平正播下反對他的種子

    反「習」不反「共」——《更長電報》是對《長電報》的倒行逆施

    上一個 下一個
  • 人權觀察

    【老陳時評】將抵制北京冬奧成為歷史的拐點

    【老陳時評】:專制獨裁下的美麗女性

    獨裁者心心相映進行骯髒交易

    疫情爆發一年後,仍有七名記者因相關報導遭到监禁

    【北京觀察】:中共司法與傳統節日 ——有感耿瀟男的審判日

    上一個 下一個
  • 人文天下

    德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠

    【老陳時評】將抵制北京冬奧成為歷史的拐點

    過年

    頭上三尺有神明,害人之心不可有——《1957年受難者姓名大辭典》

    青山有幸埋忠骨——廖宗澤將軍與蔣百里校長都葬於杭州南山公墓

    上一個 下一個
  • 歐洲風情

    德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠

    雪天的聯想——從歌德到「川粉」

    不來梅城市樂手的活命哲學

    我的第二家園天鵝山莊 ——我的家在德國鄉村(三)

    瓦森貝格的故事 ——我的家在德國鄉村(二)

    上一個 下一個
  • 文學世界

    【老陳時評】:此地無銀三百兩石正麗論文被刪

    【老陳時評】:《新冠病毒周年祭》第一章訓誡書

    閻連科:農村就像一個開滿鮮花的垃圾場

    “Keep Your Mouth Shut and Meet No Reporters”: PEN and Chinese Authority

    此生無分待他生——余英時與周棄子不為人知的交往

    上一個 下一個
  • 視頻薈萃

    Remembering Dr. Li Wenliang

    畢生獻憲政 丹心照千秋(下)

    畢生獻憲政 丹心照千秋(上)

    發自肯彭市的聖誕祝禱

    與謝志偉大使談拜登執政後台灣的前景 (視頻)

    上一個 下一個
  • 專文
    • 香江寄語
    • 胡平論政
    • 潤南文苑
    • 北京觀察
    • 長平筆談
    • 墨爾本夜語
  • 古典音樂

    精選舒伯特鋼琴古典音樂Ⅱ

    約翰斯特勞斯「春之聲」圓舞曲

    維瓦地古典音樂精選

    孟德爾松古典音樂

    布拉姆斯古典音樂精選

    上一個 下一個
  • 田牧新著

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】第九章 變味的瀘順起義(上)

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】:第八章 湮沒的歷史(下)

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】:第八章 湮沒的歷史(上)

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】:第七章 蔣介石點兵(下)

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】:第七章 蔣介石點兵(上)

    上一個 下一個
  • English

    Seeing the CCP Clearly

    Remembering Dr. Li Wenliang

    Obituary on Wang Ce

    EU-China investment Agreement Lacks Reciprocity

    Internet Surveillance, a Visible and Invisible Hand

    上一個 下一個
  • 首頁
  • 關注熱點

    【歐洲之聲】G7峰會梅克爾又「綏靖」了?

    【胡平論政】:從港首林鄭月娥接種中國疫苗談起

    德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠

    【老陳時評】將抵制北京冬奧成為歷史的拐點

    【美國之音】六十年的中國觀察 孔傑榮:習近平正播下反對他的種子

    上一個 下一個
  • 政經論壇

    【歐洲之聲】G7峰會梅克爾又「綏靖」了?

    中共為何隆重紀念華國鋒

    【胡平論政】:從港首林鄭月娥接種中國疫苗談起

    【美國之音】六十年的中國觀察 孔傑榮:習近平正播下反對他的種子

    反「習」不反「共」——《更長電報》是對《長電報》的倒行逆施

    上一個 下一個
  • 人權觀察

    【老陳時評】將抵制北京冬奧成為歷史的拐點

    【老陳時評】:專制獨裁下的美麗女性

    獨裁者心心相映進行骯髒交易

    疫情爆發一年後,仍有七名記者因相關報導遭到监禁

    【北京觀察】:中共司法與傳統節日 ——有感耿瀟男的審判日

    上一個 下一個
  • 人文天下

    德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠

    【老陳時評】將抵制北京冬奧成為歷史的拐點

    過年

    頭上三尺有神明,害人之心不可有——《1957年受難者姓名大辭典》

    青山有幸埋忠骨——廖宗澤將軍與蔣百里校長都葬於杭州南山公墓

    上一個 下一個
  • 歐洲風情

    德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠

    雪天的聯想——從歌德到「川粉」

    不來梅城市樂手的活命哲學

    我的第二家園天鵝山莊 ——我的家在德國鄉村(三)

    瓦森貝格的故事 ——我的家在德國鄉村(二)

    上一個 下一個
  • 文學世界

    【老陳時評】:此地無銀三百兩石正麗論文被刪

    【老陳時評】:《新冠病毒周年祭》第一章訓誡書

    閻連科:農村就像一個開滿鮮花的垃圾場

    “Keep Your Mouth Shut and Meet No Reporters”: PEN and Chinese Authority

    此生無分待他生——余英時與周棄子不為人知的交往

    上一個 下一個
  • 視頻薈萃

    Remembering Dr. Li Wenliang

    畢生獻憲政 丹心照千秋(下)

    畢生獻憲政 丹心照千秋(上)

    發自肯彭市的聖誕祝禱

    與謝志偉大使談拜登執政後台灣的前景 (視頻)

    上一個 下一個
  • 專文
    • 香江寄語
    • 胡平論政
    • 潤南文苑
    • 北京觀察
    • 長平筆談
    • 墨爾本夜語
  • 古典音樂

    精選舒伯特鋼琴古典音樂Ⅱ

    約翰斯特勞斯「春之聲」圓舞曲

    維瓦地古典音樂精選

    孟德爾松古典音樂

    布拉姆斯古典音樂精選

    上一個 下一個
  • 田牧新著

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】第九章 變味的瀘順起義(上)

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】:第八章 湮沒的歷史(下)

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】:第八章 湮沒的歷史(上)

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】:第七章 蔣介石點兵(下)

    【戰犯與英烈——軍統精英廖宗澤】:第七章 蔣介石點兵(上)

    上一個 下一個
  • English

    Seeing the CCP Clearly

    Remembering Dr. Li Wenliang

    Obituary on Wang Ce

    EU-China investment Agreement Lacks Reciprocity

    Internet Surveillance, a Visible and Invisible Hand

    上一個 下一個
沒有結果
查看所有結果
歐洲之聲 Sino Euro Voices
沒有結果
查看所有結果
首頁 English

EU-China investment Agreement Lacks Reciprocity

邵江文 /邵江
2021 年 1 月 19 日
在 English, 政經論壇, 關注熱點
EU-China investment Agreement Lacks Reciprocity

After seven years of negotiations, the EU and China signed the China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment(CAI)at the end of 2020. Photo:sohcradio.com

转换简体
分享到 Facebook分享到 Twitter分享到 Line分享到 WeChat

Written by Shao Jiang

推薦新聞

【歐洲之聲】G7峰會梅克爾又「綏靖」了?

【歐洲之聲】G7峰會梅克爾又「綏靖」了?

2021 年 2 月 25 日
中共為何隆重紀念華國鋒

中共為何隆重紀念華國鋒

2021 年 2 月 25 日

After seven years of negotiations, the EU and China signed the China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment(CAI)at the end of 2020. The EU declared that “CAI will help rebalance the trade and investment relations between the EU and China once in effect, and EU companies will benefit from fairer treatment when competing in the Chinese market”. So is the CAI really reciprocal?

First of all, from the perspective of investment fields, the agreement broadens the EU in China’s investment fields, such as renewable energy and high-tech manufacturing. In addition, China has also promised to begin gradually opening up international maritime and air transportation, health, finance, business services, research and development, and telecommunications /cloud services, health, environmental protection services. However, the CCP has clearly been prepared before that and has passed legislation to impose substantial restrictions on EU investment. For example, the 2020 version of the “Special Administrative Measures for Foreign Investment Access (Negative List)” explicitly prohibits investment in many fields, and some fields only allow investment in joint ventures. At the same time, the “Measures for the Security Review of Foreign Investment” passed at the end of November 2020 requires foreign investment to conduct security reviews. The review areas include “important agricultural products, important energy and resources, major equipment manufacturing, important infrastructure, and important transportation services, important cultural products and services, important information technology and Internet products and services, important financial services, key technologies and other important fields”. In contrast, the EU has not imposed similar restrictions on Chinese investment in the EU.

Does EU cares about the suppression of the Uyguhrs in Xinjiang? Phonto:nordbayern.de

Regarding the share of investment shares, China’s laws and regulations also set upper limits on foreign shares, including clearly stating that in some areas the Chinese party must “hold” or “obtain effective control of the invested enterprise”. China’s investment in the EU is rarely subject to such restrictions, and it can even acquire related companies. For example, China National Building Materials Group Corporation acquired Avancis (German manufacturer of CIGS photovoltaic modules), Xinjiang Goldwind Company acquired German wind-turbine maker Vensys Energy AG, Midea acquired the German robotics company KUKA, China National Chemical Corporation acquired the KraussMaffei Group (a manufacturer of industrial machinery), and Chinese capital becomes the largest shareholder of Daimler. One of the pitfalls of this non-reciprocity is that the EU will not have any countermeasures if Chinese related industries dump in the EU. In fact, many investment areas of the CAI have been included in the “Made in China 2025” by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). China’s goal is to raise funds from the EU, to master the EU’s advanced technology and management in related industries through mandatory “cooperation” and “joint development”, so as to gradually achieve a strategic upgrade of China’s industry.

The “Investment Agreement” does not stipulate the prohibition of forced labour, nor does it include provisions to protect labour.Photo:onenewsnow.com

In addition, the CAI does not provide specific provisions for effective arbitration in the event of disputes, so in the end, it can only be determined in accordance with the provisions of the World Trade Organization. In the past two decades, the United States and the European Union have complained to the WTO about China’s trade barriers and unfair technology transfer, and all the endings are unresolved. Since the Chinese government has not signed the “Government Procurement Agreement”, the cost of China’s breach of the agreement can only be borne by the other party, so the arbitration claimed by the EU is nothing more than arbitration by each. The CCP is free to invoke national security provisions to prevent or restrict investment by EU companies as well as hunt, induce or force technology transfer from EU companies. Once this happens, because China prohibits EU investment in areas related to legal affairs and does not allow EU lawyers to become partners of Chinese law firms, it is difficult for EU parties to find qualified lawyers to litigate against the government departments and businesses in China, let alone expect an independent court. In contrast, China can run sole or joint law firms in many EU countries to represent Chinese companies in legal matters in the EU

The areas not covered by the CAI are also an important reason for the current $164 billion trade deficit and investment lacking reciprocity between the EU and China. For example, China prohibits the European Union from owning or partially owning airports or ports in China by way of investment, but China currently owns or partially owns 1 airport (after full Brexit) and 6 seaports in the EU. 

The CAI does not provide for investment in the fields of social sciences, education, and media, in which the EU has the most strength and the least reciprocity. China expressly prohibits foreign investment in the fields of humanities and social sciences research, compulsory education, religious education, social surveys, etc. In the past two decades, China has funded almost all the humanities and social science disciplines of leading universities in the EU, engaged in social research and research development, set up more than 130 Confucius Institutes in EU countries and nearly 300 Confucius classes in secondary schools, exporting authoritarian ideology through acculturation and corrupting academic freedom in the EU. The CCP prohibits foreign investment in news agencies, books, newspapers, periodicals, audio-visual products and electronic publications in China, but the CCP’s official media and affiliates are allowed to invest and operate in the EU and become the mouthpiece of the Party’s foreign propaganda.

Regrettably, the “Investment Agreement” does not stipulate the prohibition of forced labour, nor does it include provisions to protect labour. The Chinese government’s blank check of “continuous and sustained efforts” to “ratify the ILO’s basic convention on forced labour” is nothing more than a loincloth handed to EU politicians and capitalists so that they can pretend not to see the Uighurs’ forced labour in the concentration camps in which Uyghurs are forced to produce slave labour products.——End—

The Chinese version of this article:https://sinoeurovoices.com/%e6%ad%90%e7%9b%9f%e8%88%87%e4%b8%ad%e5%9c%8b%e7%b0%bd%e7%bd%b2%e7%9a%84%e3%80%8a%e5%85%a8%e9%9d%a2%e6%8a%95%e8%b3%87%e5%8d%94%e5%ae%9a%e3%80%8b%e5%b0%8d%e7%ad%89%e9%ba%bd%ef%bc%9f/

About the author:

Dr Shao Jiang, a former prisoner of conscience for his active role in the 1989 pro-democracy movement is a committed activist-scholar, who lives and works in exile in London. The academic interests focus on political economy, political sociology, politics and media, social movement, democratisation, feminism, law in PRC and Hong Kong, autonomy & sovereignty & self-determination, international Human Rights mechanisms, comparative studies on development models and political institutions, theory and practice of Civil Society. Publications include Citizen Publications in China before the Internet (Palgrave, 2015).

標籤: Confucius InstituteEU-China Investment AgreementShao Jiang
分享Tweet分享分享
上一篇文章

歐盟與中國簽署的《全面投資協定》對等麽?

下一篇文章

【老陳時評】:重蹈覆轍的拜登政府對華政策

邵江

邵江

相關文章

【歐洲之聲】G7峰會梅克爾又「綏靖」了?
政經論壇

【歐洲之聲】G7峰會梅克爾又「綏靖」了?

2021 年 2 月 25 日
中共為何隆重紀念華國鋒
政經論壇

中共為何隆重紀念華國鋒

2021 年 2 月 25 日
【胡平論政】:從港首林鄭月娥接種中國疫苗談起
政經論壇

【胡平論政】:從港首林鄭月娥接種中國疫苗談起

2021 年 2 月 25 日
德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠
人文天下

德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠

2021 年 2 月 23 日
【老陳時評】將抵制北京冬奧成為歷史的拐點
人文天下

【老陳時評】將抵制北京冬奧成為歷史的拐點

2021 年 2 月 23 日
【美國之音】六十年的中國觀察 孔傑榮:習近平正播下反對他的種子
政經論壇

【美國之音】六十年的中國觀察 孔傑榮:習近平正播下反對他的種子

2021 年 2 月 23 日
下一篇文章
【老陳時評】:重蹈覆轍的拜登政府對華政策

【老陳時評】:重蹈覆轍的拜登政府對華政策

人權組織反對冬奧在中國舉行

人權組織反對冬奧在中國舉行

天長地久有時盡,此痛綿綿無絕期——追憶王策先生

天長地久有時盡,此痛綿綿無絕期——追憶王策先生

熱門文章

請看清中共

請看清中共

2021 年 2 月 12 日
EU-China investment Agreement Lacks Reciprocity

EU-China investment Agreement Lacks Reciprocity

2021 年 1 月 19 日
冠狀病毒大流行起源武漢病毒研究所

冠狀病毒大流行起源武漢病毒研究所

2021 年 2 月 20 日
Seeing the CCP Clearly

Seeing the CCP Clearly

2021 年 2 月 13 日
畢生獻憲政 丹心照千秋(上)

畢生獻憲政 丹心照千秋(上)

2021 年 1 月 25 日
【老陳時評】:專制獨裁下的美麗女性

【老陳時評】:專制獨裁下的美麗女性

2021 年 2 月 12 日
【北京觀察】:華國鋒的下台和胡耀邦的上台

【北京觀察】:華國鋒的下台和胡耀邦的上台

2021 年 2 月 23 日
歐洲之聲

歐洲之聲網站根植於歐陸,創刊於庚子年新冠疫情席捲全球之際。數據化時代早已來臨,面對浩瀚的知識和信息海洋,太容易迷失方向。作為長年的媒體工作者,本網刊願為華語世界的讀者傳送平實可靠的資訊,也為追求民主、自由、人權的有識之士及愛好文藝的友朋提供寫作發文的平台。祈望這裡成為志同道合者共同耕耘的園地。

分類

  • English
  • 人文天下
  • 人權觀察
  • 北京觀察
  • 古典音樂
  • 墨爾本夜語
  • 專文
  • 政經論壇
  • 文學世界
  • 未分類
  • 歐洲風情
  • 潤南文苑
  • 田牧新著
  • 胡平論政
  • 視頻薈萃
  • 長平筆談
  • 關注熱點
  • 香江寄語
  • 歐洲風情
德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠

德國「末代皇帝」後裔要求王室索賠

2021 年 2 月 23 日
雪天的聯想——從歌德到「川粉」

雪天的聯想——從歌德到「川粉」

2021 年 1 月 22 日

適用電子郵件訂閱網站

輸入你的電子郵件地址訂閱網站的新文章,使用電子郵件接收新通知。

關注我們

沒有結果
查看所有結果
  • 首頁
  • 關注熱點
  • 政經論壇
  • 人權觀察
  • 人文天下
  • 歐洲風情
  • 文學世界
  • 視頻薈萃
  • 專文
    • 墨爾本夜語
    • 香江寄語
    • 胡平論政
    • 長平筆談
    • 北京觀察
    • 潤南文苑
  • English
  • 古典音樂
  • 田牧新著

© 2020 歐洲之聲 Sino Euro Voices.

歐洲之聲網站使用 cookie 為您提供更好的使用體驗, 請閱讀我們的 隱私權政策,通過使用表示您確認並同意我們的政策。