• 歐洲之聲發刊詞 Eng
  • 關於我們 About us
  • 隱私條款 Privacy Policy
  • 提供新聞 Authors contributions
  • 連絡我們 Contact us
歐洲之聲 Sino Euro Voices
  • 首頁
  • 關注熱點

    高善文為何讓人如此懷念?

    眾說紛紜的審判:《東京大審》薦文

    台灣正打造無人機國家隊,面對中國威脅台灣希望將無人機轉化為戰略優勢

    拉美為何集體右轉?真正變化的不是政黨,是選民

    德語媒體:中國的監控技術正在悄然改變世界

    上一個 下一個
  • 政經論壇

    【老陳時評】唱「天路」走個面兒的韓紅

    中國《民族團結進步法》生效首日 跨族裔及異議人士齊聚阿姆斯特丹抗議

    高善文為何讓人如此懷念?

    拉美為何集體右轉?真正變化的不是政黨,是選民

    解碼中國:中歐「貿易再平衡」行動

    上一個 下一個
  • 人權觀察

    一趟受阻之旅

    一顆真誠心靈的勝利

    雷古拉·文斯克祝詞:讓我們記得劉曉波,傳承他的精神遺產

    謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」

    紀念,是為了傳承——紀念劉曉波逝世九周年暨首屆劉曉波人權獎頒獎典禮簡報

    上一個 下一個
  • 人文天下

    巴黎「星球細胞城」游樂場所設計方案——2026年7月14日法國國慶日公佈

    一趟受阻之旅

    一顆真誠心靈的勝利

    雷古拉·文斯克祝詞:讓我們記得劉曉波,傳承他的精神遺產

    謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」

    上一個 下一個
  • 歐洲風情

    歐洲民主防護盾 為何與如何打造

    巴黎開業首日 Shein深陷輿論風暴

    展示向日葵的土地:艾未未深入「戰爭腹地」拍攝關於烏克蘭的電影

    歐洲思想文化長廊:德國浪漫主義之四:豐饒之地–哥尼斯堡的傳奇

    歐洲思想文化長廊:德國浪漫主義之三:對啟蒙觀念的警覺

    上一個 下一個
  • 文學世界

    瑞典茉莉第十二次自選題畫詩10首

    幸好,1980年代中國引進了《1984》

    暴君為何懼怕藝術家?

    在算法的霧里重讀卡爾維諾

    懷念我們的朋友:黎奇

    上一個 下一個
  • 視頻薈萃

    《法蘭克福彙報》:歐洲向中國靠近

    CHINA UND WIR · Ein riskantes Spiel

    為信仰與理想奮鬥一生——劉曉波逝世 8 周年紀念會

    台灣,怎麽了?

    看九州:關注中國的婦女權利

    上一個 下一個
  • 專文
    • 田牧新著
    • 淇園漫步
    • 田牧筆談
    • 老陳時評
    • 胡平論政
    • 香江寄語
    • 北京觀察
    • 比爾曼自傳
    • 潤南文苑
    • 雪山下的火焰
    • 嚴家祺新著
    • 嚴家祺新著
    • 老魏論天下
    • 六四專欄
    • 追思萬潤南
    • 民運交流
    • 文革60週年
  • 古典音樂

    精選舒伯特鋼琴古典音樂Ⅱ

    約翰斯特勞斯「春之聲」圓舞曲

    維瓦地古典音樂精選

    孟德爾松古典音樂

    布拉姆斯古典音樂精選

    上一個 下一個
  • English

    謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」

    習近平7·1講話的政治邏輯——改革開放之後中共政治路線轉向何處The Political Logic of Xi Jinping’s July 1 Speech

    2026年劉曉波逝世9周年 ——首屆劉曉波人權獎頒獎典禮暨中國憲政民主討論會

    川普重返白宮一年實現巨額財富增長Trump Had a Billion-Dollar Windfall After Returning to the White House

    北京證實小型飛機撞擊「中國尊」,稱飛行員死亡China Confirms Death of Pilot Who Flew Small Plane Into Beijing’s Tallest Tower

    上一個 下一個
  • 首頁
  • 關注熱點

    高善文為何讓人如此懷念?

    眾說紛紜的審判:《東京大審》薦文

    台灣正打造無人機國家隊,面對中國威脅台灣希望將無人機轉化為戰略優勢

    拉美為何集體右轉?真正變化的不是政黨,是選民

    德語媒體:中國的監控技術正在悄然改變世界

    上一個 下一個
  • 政經論壇

    【老陳時評】唱「天路」走個面兒的韓紅

    中國《民族團結進步法》生效首日 跨族裔及異議人士齊聚阿姆斯特丹抗議

    高善文為何讓人如此懷念?

    拉美為何集體右轉?真正變化的不是政黨,是選民

    解碼中國:中歐「貿易再平衡」行動

    上一個 下一個
  • 人權觀察

    一趟受阻之旅

    一顆真誠心靈的勝利

    雷古拉·文斯克祝詞:讓我們記得劉曉波,傳承他的精神遺產

    謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」

    紀念,是為了傳承——紀念劉曉波逝世九周年暨首屆劉曉波人權獎頒獎典禮簡報

    上一個 下一個
  • 人文天下

    巴黎「星球細胞城」游樂場所設計方案——2026年7月14日法國國慶日公佈

    一趟受阻之旅

    一顆真誠心靈的勝利

    雷古拉·文斯克祝詞:讓我們記得劉曉波,傳承他的精神遺產

    謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」

    上一個 下一個
  • 歐洲風情

    歐洲民主防護盾 為何與如何打造

    巴黎開業首日 Shein深陷輿論風暴

    展示向日葵的土地:艾未未深入「戰爭腹地」拍攝關於烏克蘭的電影

    歐洲思想文化長廊:德國浪漫主義之四:豐饒之地–哥尼斯堡的傳奇

    歐洲思想文化長廊:德國浪漫主義之三:對啟蒙觀念的警覺

    上一個 下一個
  • 文學世界

    瑞典茉莉第十二次自選題畫詩10首

    幸好,1980年代中國引進了《1984》

    暴君為何懼怕藝術家?

    在算法的霧里重讀卡爾維諾

    懷念我們的朋友:黎奇

    上一個 下一個
  • 視頻薈萃

    《法蘭克福彙報》:歐洲向中國靠近

    CHINA UND WIR · Ein riskantes Spiel

    為信仰與理想奮鬥一生——劉曉波逝世 8 周年紀念會

    台灣,怎麽了?

    看九州:關注中國的婦女權利

    上一個 下一個
  • 專文
    • 田牧新著
    • 淇園漫步
    • 田牧筆談
    • 老陳時評
    • 胡平論政
    • 香江寄語
    • 北京觀察
    • 比爾曼自傳
    • 潤南文苑
    • 雪山下的火焰
    • 嚴家祺新著
    • 嚴家祺新著
    • 老魏論天下
    • 六四專欄
    • 追思萬潤南
    • 民運交流
    • 文革60週年
  • 古典音樂

    精選舒伯特鋼琴古典音樂Ⅱ

    約翰斯特勞斯「春之聲」圓舞曲

    維瓦地古典音樂精選

    孟德爾松古典音樂

    布拉姆斯古典音樂精選

    上一個 下一個
  • English

    謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」

    習近平7·1講話的政治邏輯——改革開放之後中共政治路線轉向何處The Political Logic of Xi Jinping’s July 1 Speech

    2026年劉曉波逝世9周年 ——首屆劉曉波人權獎頒獎典禮暨中國憲政民主討論會

    川普重返白宮一年實現巨額財富增長Trump Had a Billion-Dollar Windfall After Returning to the White House

    北京證實小型飛機撞擊「中國尊」,稱飛行員死亡China Confirms Death of Pilot Who Flew Small Plane Into Beijing’s Tallest Tower

    上一個 下一個
沒有結果
查看所有結果
歐洲之聲 Sino Euro Voices
沒有結果
查看所有結果
首頁 English

Internet Censorship 2022: A Global Map of Internet Restrictions

Comparitech文 /Comparitech
2022-02-12
在 English, 專文, 歐洲風情
Internet Censorship 2022: A Global Map of Internet Restrictions

Comparitech founded in 2015 is a pro-consumer website providing information, tools, reviews and comparisons to help readers in the US, UK and the rest of the world improve their cyber security and privacy online. Picture: Comparitech website.

转换简体
分享到 Facebook分享到 Twitter分享到 Line分享到 WeChat

Comparitech write PAUL BISCHOFF

推薦新聞

謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」

謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」

2026-07-15
高善文為何讓人如此懷念?

高善文為何讓人如此懷念?

2026-07-09

Nearly 60 percent of the world’s population (4.66 billion people) uses the internet. It’s our source of instant information, entertainment, news, and social interactions.

But where in the world can citizens enjoy equal and open internet access – if anywhere?

In this exploratory study, our researchers have conducted a country-by-country comparison to see which countries impose the harshest internet restrictions and where citizens can enjoy the most online freedom. This includes restrictions or bans for torrenting, pornography, social media, and VPNs, and restrictions or heavy censorship of political media. This year, we have also added the restriction of messaging/VoIP apps.

Although the usual culprits take the top spots, a few seemingly free countries rank surprisingly high. With ongoing restrictions and pending laws, our online freedom is at more risk than ever.

We scored each country on six criteria. Each of these is worth two points aside from messaging/VoIP apps which is worth one (this is due to many countries banning or restricting certain apps but allowing ones run by the government/telecoms providers within the country). The country receives one point if the content—torrents, pornography, news media, social media, VPNs, messaging/VoIP apps—is restricted but accessible, and two points if it is banned entirely. The higher the score, the more censorship.

China is on top of the worst countries for internet censorship. Picture:medium.com

The worst countries for internet censorship

  1. North Korea and China (11/11) – No map of online censorship would be complete without these two at the top of the list. There isn’t anything either of them doesn’t heavily censor thanks to their iron grip over the entire internet. Users are unable to use western social media, watch porn, or use torrents or VPNs*. And all of the political media published in the country is heavily censored and influenced by the government. Both also shut down messaging apps from abroad, forcing residents to use ones that have been made (and are likely controlled) within the country, e.g. WeChat in China. Not only does WeChat have no form of end-to-end encryption, the app also has backdoors that enable third parties to access messages.
  2. Iran (10/11): Iran blocks VPNs (only government-approved ones are permitted, which renders them almost useless) but doesn’t completely ban torrenting. Pornography is also banned and social media is under increasing restrictions. Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube are all blocked with increasing pressures to block other popular social media sites. Many messaging apps are also banned with authorities pushing domestic apps and services as an alternative. Political media is heavily censored.
  3. Belarus, Qatar, Syria, Thailand, Turkmenistan, and the UAE (8/11): Turkmenistan, Belarus, and the UAE all featured in our “worst countries” breakdown in 2020.  But this year they are joined by Qatar, Syria, and Thailand. All of these countries ban pornography, have heavily censored political media, restrict social media (bans have also been seen in Turkmenistan), and restrict the use of VPNs. Thailand saw the biggest increase in censorship, including the introduction of an online porn ban which saw 190 adult websites being taken down. This included Pornhub (which featured as one of the top 20 most visited websites in the country in 2019).

*Even though VPNs are technically blocked, some do still work in China. This is the same with porn websites in many of the aforementioned countries. Many porn websites will create “mirror” sites to give access to people in restricted countries, but these will often be blocked once authorities become aware of them.

The countries that have increased censorship in 2021

If we compare the scores for each country from our 2020 study to our 2021 study, there are three countries that appear to have upped their censorship. One, as we have already seen, is Thailand. The second, Guinea, saw increased political media restrictions suspensions or threats of suspension across several websites during the October 2020 elections as well as social media restrictions during this time (and ahead of the vote in March, too).

The third is perhaps the most surprising, though. Greece received a mere one point in our first study for its restriction of torrenting (which occurs in every country studied). But in our 2021 revisit, it scores 3. This is due to increased actions against torrenting and restrictions on political media. Reporters without Borders suggested there was a decrease in press freedom during 2020. Media outlets that were critical of the government were omitted or given disproportionately small figures from tax rebates. Public TV channels were ordered not to broadcast a video that showed the prime minister disregarding lockdown rules in February 2021. Coverage of the refugee crisis was heavily restricted. And journalists were reported to have been obstructed by police at a commemorative event. A renowned Greek crime journalist, Giorgos Karaivaz, was also assassinated in April 2021.

Online censorship in Europe

  • 18 countries have banned or shut down torrenting sites. A number have also introduced measures but aren’t blocking websites as of yet (Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia). As they aren’t blocking torrenting sites, these haven’t been scored as having “sites blocked” and are instead scored as being “restricted.”
  • While torrenting websites are often blocked in Spain (hence why it is classed as having shut down torrenting sites), rules do permit torrenting for personal use (downloading to view but not to upload or distribute).
  • Ukraine restricts online pornography while Belarus and Turkey ban/block the content entirely.
  • Political media is restricted in 12 countries. As we have already seen, Greece joined this list this year as did Hungary and Kosovo.
  • Two countries heavily censor political media – Belarus and Turkey.
  • No European countries block or ban social media but five do restrict it. These are Belarus, Montenegro, Spain, Turkey, and Ukraine.
  • Turkey restricts the use of VPNs while Belarus bans them entirely.
  • Messaging and VoIP apps are unrestricted across Europe.

Online censorship in North America

  • Canada, Mexico, and the United States have banned or shut down torrenting sites.
  • Cuba is the only country to restrict online pornography, heavily censor its political media, and restrict VPNs.
  • Six other countries (El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Panama) have some restrictions across their political media. The US saw an improvement in this area this year as restrictions on political media have eased since the last presidential election.
  • Cuba and Honduras have restrictions across social media platforms.
  • Messaging and VoIP apps are met with restrictions in Belize, Cuba, and Mexico. Cuba restricted access to social media and WhatsApp following anti-government protests. In Mexico, some ISPs block VoIP services, while Belize telecoms providers offer their own VoIP services while banning others.

Online censorship in South America

  • Argentina is the only country to actively block torrenting websites while Venezuela is the only one to restrict online pornography.
  • Political media is restricted in half (6) of the South American countries we covered. It is also heavily censored in Venezuela with persistent attempts to control the news and silence independent media outlets.
  • Ecuador and Venezuela have social media restrictions.
  • None of the countries have restrictions or bans VPN use at present.
  • Three countries have restricted messaging/VoIP apps (Brazil, Guyana, and Venezuela). As well as VoIP apps being banned by Brazil’s largest ISP, a bill threatened to mandate traceability in private messaging (however, at the time of writing, this hasn’t yet been signed into law).

Online censorship in Asia

  • 12 Asian countries have blocked or banned torrenting sites.
  • The majority of Asian countries have restrictions on online pornography (40 out of the 49 we covered–82 percent) with 27 of these having full bans/blocks.
  • Political media is also heavily restricted and censored in Asia. 43 (88 percent) of the countries we covered have restrictions, with the majority (28) being subject to heavy censorship.
  • A large number (32) of these countries restrict social media platforms in some way. China, Iran, North Korea, and Turkmenistan go one step further and enforce full bans across popular social media platforms.
  • Four countries have full bans on VPN use (China, Iran, Iraq, and North Korea), and a further 11 impose restrictions.
  • Messaging and VoIP app restrictions are also commonplace in Asia with 13 countries implementing some form of limitation. Although Russia did ban Telegram in 2018, this was lifted in June 2020. However, as the government continues to look for ways to restrict websites and apps from outside the country, this could change at any time.

Online censorship in Africa

  • South Africa is the only African country to actively shut down torrenting sites.
  • 14 African countries have restrictions when it comes to online pornography with four of these having full bans (Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Tanzania, and Uganda). New regulations in Tanzania further defined pornography as a type of “prohibited content.”
  • Most of the African countries we covered (43 of 53–81 percent) restrict political media. 11 of these enforce heavy censorship with Algeria, Cameroon, and Chad all upping their suppression of political commentary since our last study.
  • 60 percent of the African countries we covered implement social media restrictions but only one of these–Eritrea–has gone so far as to continually block access to social media sites.
  • Egypt is the only country to restrict VPN use. Despite VPNs being legal, many VPN providers’ websites and servers are blocked (these are the best options when choosing a VPN in Egypt).
  • Egypt is also one of the seven countries to have restrictions surrounding the use of messaging/VoIP apps. The others are Burundi, Equatorial Guinea, Sierra Leone, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia.

Online censorship in Oceania

  • Australia is the only country to strictly enforce torrenting bans/blocks and, along with Papua New Guinea, has restrictions on online pornography, too. The Australian Broadcasting Service Act 1992 illegalizes watching internet porn, establishing it as a fineable offense. However, only some towns and cities have tried to establish a full ban. Australia’s Online Content Bill, which is expected to come into law soon, also threatens to further restrict access to online porn in the country.
  • Political media is restricted in Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, and Tonga but only Papua New Guinea has the ability to restrict social media through its cybercrime law which was introduced in 2016.
  • None of the Oceania countries restrict the use of VPNs or VoIP/messaging apps.

Will online censorship become the “norm?”

While it’s no great surprise to see the likes of China, Russia, and North Korea topping the list, the growing number of restrictions in many other countries is greatly concerning.

From Australia’s ongoing attempts to block porn to growing political media hostility in many countries, our online freedom is something we can no longer take for granted.

Thankfully, VPNs do still offer a way for many of us to surf the net privately (and legally). But as censorship becomes increasingly common, more and more countries could join the restricted list, putting citizens’ digital privacy at risk.

Methodology

To find out to what extent each country is censored, we have studied each in detail to see what restrictions, if any, they impose across torrents, pornography, political media, social media, VPNs, and messaging/VoIP apps.

We scored each country on six criteria. Each of these is worth two points aside from messaging/VoIP apps which is worth one (this is due to many countries banning or restricting certain apps but allowing ones run by the government/telecoms providers within the country). The country receives one point if the content—torrents, pornography, news media, social media, VPNs, messaging/VoIP apps—is restricted but accessible, and two points if it is banned entirely. The higher the score, the more censorship.

In some cases, countries may be scored as having banned one of these areas but residents may find ways to circumnavigate these bans, e.g. with VPNs or mirror sites. However, as the country enforces this ban by blocking websites or implementing laws, the country is scored as having banned it. On the other hand, if a country has brought in regulations to try and restrict or ban an area but users continue to be able to freely use these services/websites, the country is only scored as being “restricted” because the regulations/laws aren’t being enforced.

Data researcher: George Moody

Sources

Rsf.org, https:freedom house.org/

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ct1fMxC4URDj1eYBQMOWDedb9L0R1iQK4t8CNiJGrBg/edit?usp=sharing

Courtesy of Comparitech

標籤: comparitechinternet censorship
分享Tweet分享分享
上一篇文章

梁啓超的二房

下一篇文章

【比爾曼自傳】第二章 煙霧從奧斯維辛的煙囪飄出(二)

Comparitech

Comparitech

相關文章

謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」
English

謝志偉大使:如何面對中國陷於「沒有人權」與「處罰文明」

2026-07-15
高善文為何讓人如此懷念?
專文

高善文為何讓人如此懷念?

2026-07-09
眾說紛紜的審判:《東京大審》薦文
人文天下

眾說紛紜的審判:《東京大審》薦文

2026-07-09
關於近期藏人自焚事件及中國民族政策持續收緊的聯合聲明
人權觀察

關於近期藏人自焚事件及中國民族政策持續收緊的聯合聲明

2026-07-08
【老陳時評】燃燒的獨立宣示
人權觀察

【老陳時評】燃燒的獨立宣示

2026-07-07
習近平7·1講話的政治邏輯——改革開放之後中共政治路線轉向何處The Political Logic of Xi Jinping’s July 1 Speech
English

習近平7·1講話的政治邏輯——改革開放之後中共政治路線轉向何處The Political Logic of Xi Jinping’s July 1 Speech

2026-07-05
下一篇文章
【比爾曼自傳】第二章 煙霧從奧斯維辛的煙囪飄出(二)

【比爾曼自傳】第二章 煙霧從奧斯維辛的煙囪飄出(二)

讚《千里江山圖》,且議《只此青綠》

讚《千里江山圖》,且議《只此青綠》

一場貧窮對更貧窮的剝削:中國拐賣女性的三種敘事

一場貧窮對更貧窮的剝削:中國拐賣女性的三種敘事

熱門文章

中國《民族團結進步法》生效首日 跨族裔及異議人士齊聚阿姆斯特丹抗議

中國《民族團結進步法》生效首日 跨族裔及異議人士齊聚阿姆斯特丹抗議

2026-07-09
足球——世界之鏡:從美洲世界盃看世界盃的地緣政治史

足球——世界之鏡:從美洲世界盃看世界盃的地緣政治史

2026-07-07
【老陳時評】燃燒的獨立宣示

【老陳時評】燃燒的獨立宣示

2026-07-07
紀念,是為了傳承——紀念劉曉波逝世九周年暨首屆劉曉波人權獎頒獎典禮簡報

紀念,是為了傳承——紀念劉曉波逝世九周年暨首屆劉曉波人權獎頒獎典禮簡報

2026-07-15
【六四專欄】八九「5·16」鄧小平的惱怒從何而來?

【六四專欄】八九「5·16」鄧小平的惱怒從何而來?

2026-06-26
【胡平論政】實驗室泄漏為何始終無法被排除?

【胡平論政】實驗室泄漏為何始終無法被排除?

2026-06-22
郭文貴欺詐上千支持中國民主人士被判30年,美國法官指其毫無悔意!

郭文貴欺詐上千支持中國民主人士被判30年,美國法官指其毫無悔意!

2026-07-01
歐洲之聲

歐洲之聲網站根植於歐陸,創刊於庚子年新冠疫情席捲全球之際。數據化時代早已來臨,面對浩瀚的知識和信息海洋,太容易迷失方向。作為長年的媒體工作者,本網刊願為華語世界的讀者傳送平實可靠的資訊,也為追求民主、自由、人權的有識之士及愛好文藝的友朋提供寫作發文的平台。祈望這裡成為志同道合者共同耕耘的園地。

分類

  • English
  • 人文天下
  • 人權觀察
  • 六四專欄
  • 北京觀察
  • 古典音樂
  • 嚴家祺新著
  • 圖博特
  • 墨爾本夜語
  • 專文
  • 政經論壇
  • 文學世界
  • 文革60週年
  • 未分類
  • 歐洲風情
  • 比爾曼自傳
  • 民運交流
  • 淇園漫步
  • 潤南文苑
  • 田牧新著
  • 田牧筆談
  • 老陳時評
  • 老魏論天下
  • 胡平論政
  • 視頻薈萃
  • 追思萬潤南
  • 關注熱點
  • 雪山下的火焰
  • 香江寄語
  • 歐洲風情
歐洲民主防護盾 為何與如何打造

歐洲民主防護盾 為何與如何打造

2025-11-20
巴黎開業首日 Shein深陷輿論風暴

巴黎開業首日 Shein深陷輿論風暴

2025-11-06

適用電子郵件訂閱網站

輸入你的電子郵件地址訂閱網站的新文章,使用電子郵件接收新通知。

關注我們

沒有結果
查看所有結果
  • 首頁
  • 關注熱點
  • 政經論壇
  • 人權觀察
  • 人文天下
  • 歐洲風情
  • 文學世界
  • 視頻薈萃
  • 專文
    • 墨爾本夜語
    • 香江寄語
    • 胡平論政
    • 北京觀察
    • 潤南文苑
    • 淇園漫步
    • 老陳時評
    • 雪山下的火焰
  • English
  • 古典音樂
  • 田牧新著

© 2020 歐洲之聲 Sino Euro Voices.

歐洲之聲網站使用 cookie 為您提供更好的使用體驗, 請閱讀我們的 隱私權政策,通過使用表示您確認並同意我們的政策。